When Suing is Not the Best Option
As a sports lawyer, my job is to represent my athlete clients in lawsuits. However, there are times when filing a lawsuit is not in the client’s best long-term interests, and it is my job to advise the client of this.
Take the recent ruling in the Reggie Bush lawsuit. Bush was sued by a former investor, and Bush asked the court to move the case to arbitration. One reason that parties to a lawsuit often seek to avoid the court system, is that they want to avoid the publicity that comes hand-in-hand with legal matters. All court documents are considered public material, which means that anyone – blogs, reporters, fans, etc. – can get their hands on the documents. In arbitration, on the other hand, there is no particular obligation to make the material public. Arbitration pleadings are not filed at the courthouse, as arbitration is a private matter.
In Bush’s case, his advisers do not want the NCAA to get their hands on deposition transcripts. If the NCAA reviews the depositions and finds grounds to bolster their already ongoing investigation, that could be bad news. The article says that Bush’s lawyers will now seek summary judgment. If they lose, you can bet that their will be a settlement so that Bush’s testimony does not see the light of day.
This case proves that there are always valid reasons not to sue, even when the athlete thinks a lawsuit is the best course of action.
